人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年5月4日 星期日  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2023, Vol. 38 Issue (2): 88-96    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.011
区域 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
中国区域资源环境承载力的空间特征及收敛性分析
李诚浩1, 任保平2
1. 西北大学 经济管理学院, 西安 710127;
2. 南京大学 数字经济与管理学院, 苏州 215163
STUDY ON SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CONVERGENCE OF REGIONAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT CARRYING CAPACITY IN CHINA
LI Cheng-hao1, REN Bao-ping2
1. School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China;
2. School of Digital Economics and Management, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215163, China

全文: PDF (3803 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在增强区域资源环境承载力的目标下,本文从社会承载水平、污染防治能力与生态修复潜力三个维度刻画了 2011—2019 年我国省域资源环境承载力,并利用 Dagum基尼系数探究空间差异及来源,利用空间计量模型分析收敛状态。得出如下结论:①我国区域资源环境承载力存在绝对值“西强东弱”、增长率“西快东慢”的不均衡特征;②东西部间差异是四大板块资源环境承载力空间差距的主要来源,东部地区制约着整体资源环境承载力的提升;③中、西及东北部 σ与 β收敛趋势均强于东部地区,这使得东部地区资源环境承载力整体提升面临较大压力。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李诚浩
任保平
关键词 社会承载水平污染防治能力生态修复潜力资源环境承载力空间特征    
Abstract:Based on entropy method, this paper uses panel data of 31 provinces in China (except Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) from 2011 to 2019 to describe resource and environmental carrying capacity from three dimensions of social carrying level (K1), pollution prevention capability (K2) and ecological restoration potential (K3), which is consistent with the goal of enhancing regional resources and environment carrying capacity. This paper also uses the Dagum Gini coefficient, kernel density estimation, and spatial econometric model to analyze spatial differences, dynamic feature and astringency of environmental bearing capacity of four regions in China which are east, west, middle, northeast parts. The spatial differences include withingroup variation, among groups variation and overall variation. The dynamic feature is described by Kernel density estimation, and astringency consists of σ convergence and β convergence, which is tested by Hausman, Wald, LM and LR model. It is concluded that: 1) The carrying capacity of Western China is greater than that in Eastern China, while the capacity in Western China also develops more rapid. 2) There are significant spatial differences in the resources and environment carrying capacity of these four regions, and the inter-group differences are the main sources. 3) There are significant differences in the dynamic evolution process of the absolute difference of resource carrying capacity in the four plates. 4) The characteristics of σ convergence and β convergence are different in the four tectonic plates. In Eastern China, there is no σ convergence in social carrying level, and there is no β convergence in pollution prevention capability, which puts great pressure on overall improvement of resources and environment carrying capacity.
Key wordssocial carrying level    pollution prevention capability    ecological restoration potential    resources and environmental carrying capacity    spatial feature   
收稿日期: 2021-11-23     
PACS: K901.2  
基金资助:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(19FJB011)
通讯作者: 任保平(1968—), 男, 陕西凤县人, 博士, 教育部长江学者特聘教授, 博士生导师, 主要研究方向为经济高质量发展。E-mail: xdrbp@126.com。     E-mail: xdrbp@126.com
作者简介: 李诚浩(1997—), 男, 陕西西安人, 博士生, 主要研究方向为区域经济学与宏观经济等。E-mail: lichenghao12@126.com。
引用本文:   
李诚浩, 任保平. 中国区域资源环境承载力的空间特征及收敛性分析[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(2): 88-96. LI Cheng-hao, REN Bao-ping. STUDY ON SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CONVERGENCE OF REGIONAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT CARRYING CAPACITY IN CHINA. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 38(2): 88-96.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.011      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V38/I2/88
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司